About Orre Gustav. A.I. Roland

Technological ideologist, hacker (geek+nerd) Member of the Swedish Pirate Party. Developing the next generation customer driven innovation system. Wish-IT®, Wish Innovation Technologies® http://wish-it.se I like hacking with everything that makes information useful: Electronics, free hardware/software, knowledge systems, machine learning, AI (and in the future nano technology). I consider the patent system, the current monetary system and our national borders to be our biggest obstacles against a flourishing world in peace. Proprietary software and hardware is a dead end. I use only Linux on laptops, desktops and servers. PhD in computer science. MSc in engineering physics. Skilled in software development, data analysis and pattern recognition. Developing next generation customer driven innovation systems Wish-IT®, Wish Innovation Technologies ®, implementing permaculture in the land of ideas and innovation, making the customer the inventor. Favorite quotation: “If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” -- George Bernard Shaw

42 relations: 911 time schedule in a new light

I had 42 (7*7-7) relations, this is likely the smallest data set I’ve ever analyzed. I will not present anything new here, only previously known facts, but analyzed according the time relations, which seems not to have been done before.

Just recently I had visually observed a few regularities regarding timing of the tragic 911-event which seems to be somewhat outstanding. I feel that  it is my responsibility to write down a few notes about this, as there seems as nobody else have noticed these regularities.

First one may ask, why did I check this data set? The reason is simple, some time ago I had noticed some symmetries in the timing of the 911 events, visually, but I hadn’t bothered more about it, as these timestamps have been available for the world quite long time, 4462 days, from 2001-09-11 to today 2013-11-29.  I had continue to not bother about it, if I just recently also hadn’t read the following paragraph claimed to be written within one week after the 911-event, by someone I first thought was a governmental representative, as it was a .gov site, which inspired me to write down these my observations and make a simple analysis. The statement I read, was contained in this text, and it was particularly this paragraph which made me thoughtful:

This was a remarkably simple attack. It required virtually no infrastructure in the United States. It required very little in the way of timing and logistics. The terrorists did not have to obtain explosives. There were not large numbers of people to coordinate. All they had to do was get their people to the airports on time. There was almost no way that it could fail. The attack was characterized by its simplicity and its understanding of the vulnerability of the United States.

I was completely astonished to read such a statement as I consider the whole 911-scenario to be the most well planned attack ever in history. One thing which was written in that analysis was that the terrorists may not intentionally have made the buildings to fall which at first sight may be considered a plausible statement, but as I for some time have been aware about some rather delicate regularities for the whole scenario I consider that such timing, if being deliberate, can not be ignored.

I will not form any new hypothesis or theory, I will just present these well known timestamps with some simple analysis of relations between these timestamps, which from my view, as having long experience of statistical data analysis, can hardly be considered fully coincidental.

This timing is from this governmental site, apart from the fall of the Pentagon wall, which I found here. I have tried to find the time stamps with higher resolution than minute, but not succeeded.

The timestamp in hh:mm have simply been converted to minute of the day by hh*60+mm. These are the events and how I label them:

Event Timestamp Minute Explanation Label in analysis
1h 08:46 526 WTC1 hit 1h
2h 09:03 543 WTC2 hit 2h
3h 09:37 577 3rd building, Pentagon, hit 5h
2f 09:59 599 WTC2 fall 2f
3f 10:10 610 3rd build fall, Pentagon (the wall) 5f
1f 10:28 628 WTC1 fall 1f
7h 10:28 628 WTC7 hit (garbage from WTC1 fall) 1f
7f 17:20 1040 4th building, WTC7 fall 7f

The relations: we have 7 different timestamps, which generate 7*7-7=42 different time relations (the minus was by subtracting the recurrent relation of the event towards itself) but due to time symmetry, as the only difference here between “1f-7f” and “7f-1f” would be time reversal, thus we end up with half of these relations (21) by only taking those with a positive time, which also makes the table easier to read . The numbers marked green below is the timing for WTC1 hit towards Pentagon hit (1h-5h, 51 minutes) and Pentagon hit to to WTC1 fall (5h-1f, 51 minutes).

_ 2f-5f 1h-2h 5f-1f 5h-2f 2f-1f 5h-5f 2h-5h 1h-5h 5h-1f 2h-2f 2h-5f 1h-2f 1h-5f 2h-1f 1h-1f 1f-7f 5f-7f 2f-7f 5h-7f 2h-7f 1h-7f
time 11 17 18 22 29 33 34 51 51 56 67 73 84 85 102 412 430 441 463 497 514

Then we can make a matrix of the relations. The matrix in this case is constructed by dividing the time of the relation in the column head with the one in the row head. The numbers in this matrix are exact rational numbers. Those being marked with green are those which are simple exact integer relations, or an exact fraction between small integers. Apart from the 9/11 11/9 relations which have been marked with dark orange below, as they stand for the date according US’ and European notation. The diagonal is marked grey as it will always be 1.

 

_ 2f-5f 1h-2h 5f-1f 5h-2f 2f-1f 5h-5f 2h-5h 1h-5h 5h-1f 2h-2f 2h-5f 1h-2f 1h-5f 2h-1f 1h-1f 1f-7f 5f-7f 2f-7f 5h-7f 2h-7f 1h-7f
2f-5f 1 17/11 18/11 2 29/11 3 34/11 51/11 51/11 56/11 67/11 73/11 84/11 85/11 102/11 412/11 430/11 441/11 463/11 497/11 514/11
1h-2h 11/17 1 18/17 22/17 29/17 33/17 2 3 3 56/17 67/17 73/17 84/17 5 6 412/17 430/17 441/17 463/17 497/17 514/17
5f-1f 11/18 17/18 1 11/9 29/18 11/6 17/9 17/6 17/6 28/9 67/18 73/18 14/3 85/18 17/3 206/9 215/9 49/2 463/18 497/18 257/9
5h-2f 1/2 17/22 9/11 1 29/22 3/2 17/11 51/22 51/22 28/11 67/22 73/22 42/11 85/22 51/11 206/11 215/11 441/22 463/22 497/22 257/11
2f-1f 11/29 17/29 18/29 22/29 1 33/29 34/29 51/29 51/29 56/29 67/29 73/29 84/29 85/29 102/29 412/29 430/29 441/29 463/29 497/29 514/29
5h-5f 1/3 17/33 6/11 2/3 29/33 1 34/33 17/11 17/11 56/33 67/33 73/33 28/11 85/33 34/11 412/33 430/33 147/11 463/33 497/33 514/33
2h-5h 11/34 1/2 9/17 11/17 29/34 33/34 1 3/2 3/2 28/17 67/34 73/34 42/17 5/2 3 206/17 215/17 441/34 463/34 497/34 257/17
1h-5h 11/51 1/3 6/17 22/51 29/51 11/17 2/3 1 1 56/51 67/51 73/51 28/17 5/3 2 412/51 430/51 147/17 463/51 497/51 514/51
5h-1f 11/51 1/3 6/17 22/51 29/51 11/17 2/3 1 1 56/51 67/51 73/51 28/17 5/3 2 412/51 430/51 147/17 463/51 497/51 514/51
2h-2f 11/56 17/56 9/28 11/28 29/56 33/56 17/28 51/56 51/56 1 67/56 73/56 3/2 85/56 51/28 103/14 215/28 63/8 463/56 71/8 257/28
2h-5f 11/67 17/67 18/67 22/67 29/67 33/67 34/67 51/67 51/67 56/67 1 73/67 84/67 85/67 102/67 412/67 430/67 441/67 463/67 497/67 514/67
1h-2f 11/73 17/73 18/73 22/73 29/73 33/73 34/73 51/73 51/73 56/73 67/73 1 84/73 85/73 102/73 412/73 430/73 441/73 463/73 497/73 514/73
1h-5f 11/84 17/84 3/14 11/42 29/84 11/28 17/42 17/28 17/28 2/3 67/84 73/84 1 85/84 17/14 103/21 215/42 21/4 463/84 71/12 257/42
2h-1f 11/85 1/5 18/85 22/85 29/85 33/85 2/5 3/5 3/5 56/85 67/85 73/85 84/85 1 6/5 412/85 86/17 441/85 463/85 497/85 514/85
1h-1f 11/102 1/6 3/17 11/51 29/102 11/34 1/3 1/2 1/2 28/51 67/102 73/102 14/17 5/6 1 206/51 215/51 147/34 463/102 497/102 257/51
1f-7f 11/412 17/412 9/206 11/206 29/412 33/412 17/206 51/412 51/412 14/103 67/412 73/412 21/103 85/412 51/206 1 215/206 441/412 463/412 497/412 257/206
5f-7f 11/430 17/430 9/215 11/215 29/430 33/430 17/215 51/430 51/430 28/215 67/430 73/430 42/215 17/86 51/215 206/215 1 441/430 463/430 497/430 257/215
2f-7f 11/441 17/441 2/49 22/441 29/441 11/147 34/441 17/147 17/147 8/63 67/441 73/441 4/21 85/441 34/147 412/441 430/441 1 463/441 71/63 514/441
5h-7f 11/463 17/463 18/463 22/463 29/463 33/463 34/463 51/463 51/463 56/463 67/463 73/463 84/463 85/463 102/463 412/463 430/463 441/463 1 497/463 514/463
2h-7f 11/497 17/497 18/497 22/497 29/497 33/497 34/497 51/497 51/497 8/71 67/497 73/497 12/71 85/497 102/497 412/497 430/497 63/71 463/497 1 514/497
1h-7f 11/514 17/514 9/257 11/257 29/514 33/514 17/257 51/514 51/514 28/257 67/514 73/514 42/257 85/514 51/257 206/257 215/257 441/514 463/514 497/514 1

Then we take the same relations but convert into inexact numbers (float) those relations which are not integer or a simple relation between small integers. There are most only two further relations among these, here marked with magenta, which I consider standing out.

The hit-fall time for WTC7 (412 min) the fourth building falling (if including the Pentagon wall) is almost exactly 4 times longer than the hit-fall time for WTC1 (102 min) which is exactly 206/51 or approximately 4.039215686…

The hit-fall time for the whole scenario WTC1 hit to WTC7 fall (514 min) is almost exactly 5 times the hit-fall time for WTC1 (102 min) which is exactly 257/51 or approximately 5.039215686.

The summary of the time analysis is:

Event 1 Event 2 Time 1 to 2
✈ 1. ▌ ✈ 2. ▌ 17·1 minutes
✈ 2. ▌ ✈ 5. ⬠ 17·2 minutes
✈ 1. ▌ ✈ 5. ⬠ 17·3 minutes = 51 minutes
✈ 5. ⬠ 1. ▄ ↓ 17·3 minutes = 51 minutes
✈1. ▌ 1. ▄ ↓ 17·6 = 2·51 = 102 minutes
✈ 5. ⬠ 5. ⬟↓ 11·3 minutes
✈ 5. ⬠ 2. ▄↓ 11·2 minutes
2. ▄↓ 5. ⬟↓ 11·1 minutes
✈1. ▌ 7. ▄ ↓ 514 minutes

Where the outstanding relation 102/514=51/257 gives vibes of a numerical enigma enthusiast being behind the time schedule. Especially as the time bases are 3,17,257 which are three of the only known Fermat primes, i.e. 3,5,17,257,65537

A further peculiarity, if you remove the number of involved buildings, i.e. 4, you get exact relations as (514-4)/102=5 and (412-4)/102=4.

Both of these have been marked with magenta below.

_ 2f-5f 1h-2h 5f-1f 5h-2f 2f-1f 5h-5f 2h-5h 1h-5h 5h-1f 2h-2f 2h-5f 1h-2f 1h-5f 2h-1f 1h-1f 1f-7f 5f-7f 2f-7f 5h-7f 2h-7f 1h-7f
2f-5f 1 1.54545 1.63636 2 2.63636 3 3.09091 4.6364 4.6364 5.0909 6.0909 6.6364 7.6364 7.7273 9.2727 37.455 39.091 40.091 42.091 45.182 46.727
1h-2h 0.64706 1 1.05882 1.29412 1.70588 1.94118 2 3 3 3.2941 3.9412 4.2941 4.9412 5 6 24.2353 25.2941 25.9412 27.2353 29.2353 30.2353
5f-1f 0.61111 0.94444 1 1.22222 1.61111 1.83333 1.88889 2.83333 2.83333 3.11111 3.7222 4.0556 4.6667 4.7222 5.6667 22.8889 23.8889 24.5 25.7222 27.6111 28.5556
5h-2f 1/2 0.77273 0.81818 1 1.31818 3/2 1.54545 2.31818 2.31818 2.54545 3.04545 3.3182 3.8182 3.8636 4.6364 18.7273 19.5455 20.0455 21.0455 22.5909 23.3636
2f-1f 0.37931 0.58621 0.62069 0.75862 1 1.13793 1.17241 1.75862 1.75862 1.93103 2.31034 2.51724 2.89655 2.93103 3.5172 14.2069 14.8276 15.2069 15.9655 17.1379 17.7241
5h-5f 1/3 0.51515 0.54545 2/3 0.87879 1 1.0303 1.54545 1.54545 1.69697 2.0303 2.21212 2.54545 2.57576 3.09091 12.4848 13.0303 13.3636 14.0303 15.0606 15.5758
2h-5h 0.32353 1/2 0.52941 0.64706 0.85294 0.97059 1 3/2 3/2 1.64706 1.97059 2.14706 2.47059 5/2 3 12.1176 12.6471 12.9706 13.6176 14.6176 15.1176
1h-5h 0.215686 1/3 0.35294 0.43137 0.56863 0.64706 2/3 1 1 1.09804 1.31373 1.43137 1.64706 1.66667 2 8.0784 8.4314 8.6471 9.0784 9.7451 10.0784
5h-1f 0.215686 1/3 0.35294 0.43137 0.56863 0.64706 2/3 1 1 1.09804 1.31373 1.43137 1.64706 1.66667 2 8.0784 8.4314 8.6471 9.0784 9.7451 10.0784
2h-2f 0.196429 0.303571 0.32143 0.39286 0.51786 0.58929 0.60714 0.91071 0.91071 1 1.19643 1.30357 3/2 1.51786 1.82143 7.3571 7.6786 7.875 8.2679 8.875 9.1786
2h-5f 0.164179 0.253731 0.268657 0.32836 0.43284 0.49254 0.50746 0.76119 0.76119 0.83582 1 1.08955 1.25373 1.26866 1.52239 6.1493 6.4179 6.5821 6.9104 7.4179 7.6716
1h-2f 0.150685 0.232877 0.246575 0.30137 0.39726 0.45205 0.46575 0.69863 0.69863 0.76712 0.91781 1 1.15068 1.16438 1.39726 5.6438 5.8904 6.0411 6.3425 6.8082 7.0411
1h-5f 0.130952 0.202381 0.214286 0.261905 0.34524 0.39286 0.40476 0.60714 0.60714 2/3 0.79762 0.86905 1 1.0119 1.21429 4.9048 5.119 5.25 5.5119 5.9167 6.119
2h-1f 0.129412 1/5 0.211765 0.258824 0.34118 0.38824 2/5 0.6 0.6 0.65882 0.78824 0.85882 0.98824 1 1.2 4.8471 5.0588 5.1882 5.4471 5.8471 6.0471
1h-1f 0.107843 1/6 0.176471 0.215686 0.284314 0.32353 1/3 1/2 1/2 0.54902 0.65686 0.71569 0.82353 0.83333 1 4.0392 4.2157 4.3235 4.5392 4.8725 5.0392
1f-7f 0.026699 0.041262 0.043689 0.053398 0.070388 0.080097 0.082524 0.123786 0.123786 0.135922 0.162621 0.177184 0.203883 0.206311 0.247573 1 1.04369 1.07039 1.12379 1.20631 1.24757
5f-7f 0.0255814 0.039535 0.04186 0.051163 0.067442 0.076744 0.07907 0.118605 0.118605 0.130233 0.155814 0.169767 0.195349 0.197674 0.237209 0.95814 1 1.02558 1.07674 1.15581 1.19535
2f-7f 0.0249433 0.038549 0.040816 0.049887 0.06576 0.07483 0.077098 0.115646 0.115646 0.126984 0.151927 0.165533 0.190476 0.192744 0.231293 0.93424 0.97506 1 1.04989 1.12698 1.16553
5h-7f 0.0237581 0.036717 0.038877 0.047516 0.062635 0.071274 0.073434 0.110151 0.110151 0.12095 0.144708 0.157667 0.181425 0.183585 0.220302 0.88985 0.92873 0.95248 1 1.07343 1.11015
2h-7f 0.0221328 0.034205 0.036217 0.044266 0.05835 0.066398 0.06841 0.102616 0.102616 0.112676 0.134809 0.146881 0.169014 0.171026 0.205231 0.82897 0.86519 0.88732 0.93159 1 1.03421
1h-7f 0.0214008 0.033074 0.035019 0.042802 0.05642 0.064202 0.066148 0.099222 0.099222 0.108949 0.13035 0.142023 0.163424 0.16537 0.198444 0.80156 0.83658 0.85798 0.90078 0.96693 1

I hope other people will check and validate these relations on their own. Also, it is of uttermost importance that the data is accurate. If someone has seen other time stamps for any of these events with higher resolution from reliable sources I am grateful to get to know about this.

Yours truly/Roland Orre

Peace On Earth❣

We have passed the Apocalypse..❣
What is now waiting for all is a future in Peace❣

  • No nationalistic wars❣
  • No software wars❣
  • No religious wars❣
  • No patent wars❣

We will soon open up our portal, at your service, for a sane and healthy development of mankind in peace and harmony.

  • A world without borders❣
  • A world without limits❣
  • A world full of Love

These reindeers are our Wish-IT® Mascot❣

Wish-IT® soon at your service❣

There is one tune which is my all time favorite, Imagine by John Lennon
Then, for anyone who hasn’t seen this fantastic speech Charlie Chaplin’s final speech in The Great Dictator, then it’s high time. I consider it to be the best speech ever made❣

Best holiday Greetings♡♡♡
Roland Orre

Is This New World an Utopia?

No, by definition utopia is not something you can reach.

This was the reason why I got the proposal to use nonutopia
when definining the domains nonutopia.org , nonutopia.net and nonutopia.com in 2002.

That is, the Utiopia we are aiming for is a Non Utopia, as we will be able to reach it❣

The only usage so far for these domains have been a few statements given about the future in 2004, and our patent on open innovation, which will be one of the keys to the propespering future.

Another usage has been to make a backup of President Obama’s promises, just after the election 2008, not yet fulfilled… which are on nonutopia.net, and it will stay so as we won’t use .net domains either apart from net administrations, like name servers.

We will use the domain wish-it.com to start with as in our mascot, as well as wish-it.org as generic domains but later we also promote local local top level domains due to specific local needs, e.g. wish-it.se, wish-it.us, wish-it.eu, wish-it.asia, etc. Over time we aim for top level domain free adressing as well as a more robust routing protocol than is currently implemented in the TCP/IP protocol.

Best wishes  ♡♡♡

Roland Orre

Post-Apocalyptic Thoughts❣

So, you are still asleep… ;)

The Apocalypse obviously did not happen in the way many may have expected, many will claim that it didn’t happen at all, but… if you really start looking around, if you look upon the world with new eyes, maybe you will notice that something has happened, something wonderful, something that will soon make this world a better place.

There are two kinds of people; those who see the negative trends in the society, how its all become worse and worse and how it will all come to an end; then those who doesn’t see the negative trends but the positive trends and see how great things will become; then its me, and those thinking and observing in a similar way as I do. For my own I see the negative trends, but I see them as necessary to give strength to the positive trends, to make the crisis stand out more, to increase awareness, to encourage people to start acting. I see it all as an evolutionary process, where the good always win.

(yes I got an 85% score as optimist in a test a few years ago… :-)

Best wishes about a wonderful future♡♡♡
Roland

The end❢ of the dot.com world?

(finally we all wake up❣ …)

It is clear that businesses which currently take place at many places over the world are not always for the best of the humanity and its development. The so called “profit thinking” which is short sighted and non productive, as its main goal is to make “profit” is a type of business which need to disappear or change its focus.

We need to promote the good forces in the society, we need to encouragre those who create and produce due to passion and love, those who care about what they produce and who care about the consumers. We need to encourage those who use ecological/biological producation simply because this is a more robust and well tested technology. For my own I do not oppose e.g. GMO in principle, but GMO is most often associated with harmful, monopolising, lock-in business models, where huge companies (like Monsanto) are trying to monopolise the market with patents and other types of lock ins. For a healthy development we need to promote what we know is healthy, and organic production clearly is.

 

Tomorrow: The Dawn of a Sane World❣

To all optimists in the world, make your voice heard, you are needed❣

To all pessimists in the world, start listening, listen to the optimists, things will improve❣

To all developers of long distance weapons, quit your job ASAP❣

To all pilots of killer drones, quit your job ASAP, this will make you sleep better at nights❣

To everyone who consider starting a conflict, rethink, conflicts creates conflicts, create conflicts, create conflicts…. ❣

 

UFO Disclosure❣

I haven’t seen anything yet that I’m sure about being an “UFO”, well I have seen UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects) but I can not tell that they were what people often mean by UFO that is merely ETFO (Extra Terrestrial Flying Object). Those UFOs I have seen, which I have suceeded to take some photos of, but of quite low quality, hardly interesting for anyone can certainly be explained in other ways.

In one case I noticed that a few objects, looking like planets were moving versus the background stars. However, in the photos I took, I see that it was actually the opposite, these objects I had seen wasn’t moving at all, it was all the stars in the background which were moving, that is, these objects were stationary, and compensated for the turn of the Earth. Now, someone may claim those are just geostationary satelites, but geostationary satellites (like all GPS satellites) actually move as well, apart from one specific kind placed exactly over the equator.

However, having read about and listened to many people who have seen or experienced things related to seemingly extra terrestrial activity, it would be wonderful to see all such reports to be jointly analyzed for common denominators. Often UFO reports are handled the completely opposite way… that is, people try with all kinds of means to explain observed phenomenon with “natural” explanations. This is not a very scientific way to deal with such data…

Take a specific observation, it may have a 30% chance being a natural phenomenon. Does this mean that is is a natural phenomenon? No! It means that it has a 30% chance of being a natural phenomenon and a 70% chance of being a supernatural phenomenon.

This is a mistake I see over and over, everywhere. It’s only by meta analysis (using e.g. different data mining techniques) it is possible to a make a better judgement of the observation, otherwise it becomes non productive pseudo science.

Contact❣

For everyone who has seen Star Trek: First Contact or having read Carl Sagan’s novel Contact or seen the movie Contact, based upon that novel, knows what I’m wishing for.

I find it very likely that there are other species out there, species that have become civilized, been able to reach the stage of technology needed for space travel, who altruistically search space for other species in critical stages, species needing help to overcome the birth problems.

Humanity is experiencing such a crisis now, and some people consider that the humanity will fail, become extinct because of its lack of civilization and love. Other believe that humanity will manage with the crises and become a master of technology, freedom and peace and conquer space. I belong to the latter group, but wouldn’t mind seeing some help coming from above.

Then there is a group of people who see space as a resource, with almost infinite amounts of metals, minerals and energy. I feel somewhat sick about this kind of thinking, as humanity has not yet learned to become civilized, there are still humans fighting on this planet, there are humans robbing other humans of their resources, there are humans wasting our resources in an insane way. I really hope this group of people will never reach space, as they may not be able to handle it. They may rob or fight other species out there, to steal there resources. Then I would feel very very ashamed of being human 🙁